I'd like to take a moment to talk about a thought that occurred to me while reading a Gun Rights Examiner column from today about Steve McNair's recent death and gun owners getting blamed for it. This alone is disturbing and plain silly to make such a connection. However a thought on another case is the one I really wanted to discuss.
Short story: Albert Kwok-Leung Kwan, a gun collector from Washington, was indicted in 2006 in connection with the shooting of federal prosecutor Thomas Wales, in 2001. Feds didn't believe Kwan shot Wales, but suspected Kwan may have supplied the barrel for the gun that was used to shoot Wales. Unable to lay blame on him for this specifically, feds kept laying on charges over the next several years trying to hit Kwan with anything they could find, including possession of an illegal machine gun (found not guilty), and possession of an unregistered short barrel rifle (case dismissed).
This brings us back to the original post which talks about the great big FAIL of news agencies and communities to report that this guy has finally been left alone by the feds.
"1. The lack of interest exhibited by the "gun activist" community, particularly since, at any time, many of us could be caught up in the net of over-zealous law enforcement seeking to exploit technicalities. Chatter, forum posts, blogging, and even a mention to their members by national "gun rights groups" has been, for the most part, nonexistent (although I am aware of one ongoing investigation I hope to be able to share with you soon)."
Nebraska has a few Bloggers invested in the firearm 'issue'. I can't think of any mainstream news outlets locally that I have ever seen portray firearms in a positive light. I am curious if a higher profile event did take place here, what would the media scene look like?
I also thought it was interesting to note the inherent danger in becoming active amongst our community. It isn't like being an activist for model trains. If you speak out in the community for the benefits of model trains for society, no matter how phrase your story, people will at worst think you're a little off kilter. If you speak out on the benefits of public firearms ownership, use, training, or competition, you might be branded a full-fledged lunatic, or scorned by 'enlightened' folk, or thought a vigilante-terrorist-baby-bunny-eater. If you're a student, you best not even talk about guns. Be careful not to carry where you're not welcome. It's actually even likely that you'll be harassed by law enforcement, even if you absolutely know you are within your rights. In fact, don't even carry anything that looks like a gun.
All these stories illustrate just how easy it is to give up, and not get involved with the firearm community's fight. It does take a certain strength of character to be a gun owner, to carry a weapon with you, and to be responsible with that weapon at ALL times. I'd argue it takes an even stronger person to speak out against those who would take that away.